Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

<p>The intercalating [Ru(TAP)<sub>2</sub>(dppz)]<sup>2+</sup> complex can photo-oxidise guanine in DNA, although in mixed-sequence DNA it can be difficult to understand the precise mechanism due to uncertainties in where and how the complex is bound. Replacement of guanine with the less oxidisable inosine (I) base can be used to understand the mechanism of electron transfer (ET). Here the ET has been compared for both Λ- and Δ-enantiomers of [Ru(TAP)<sub>2</sub>(dppz)]<sup>2+</sup> in a set of sequences where guanines in the readily oxidisable GG step in {TCGGCGCCGA}<sub>2</sub> have been replaced with I. The ET has been monitored using picosecond and nanosecond transient absorption and picosecond time-resolved IR spectroscopy. In both cases inosine replacement leads to a diminished yield, but the trends are strikingly different for Λ- and Δ-complexes.</p>

Original publication

DOI

10.1039/c5fd00085h

Type

Journal article

Journal

Faraday Discussions

Publisher

Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)

Publication Date

2015

Volume

185

Pages

455 - 469